A first pass at updating Tokio to use `std::future`.
Implementations of `Future` from the futures crate are updated to implement
`Future` from std. Implementations of `Stream` are moved to a feature flag.
This commits disables a number of crates that have not yet been updated.
PR #1103 accidentally changed the log level for the debug and
debug_span macros to use the INFO level instead of the DEBUG
level. This PR corrects this regression back to the intended
behavior.
## Motivation
I was just trying to use tokio-trace for a greenfield project, but I was frustrated to discover that I couldn't really use it easily.
I was using the [`runtime`](https://docs.rs/runtime/0.3.0-alpha.4/runtime/) crate, which transparently spawns a thread pool executor for futures. In that thread pool, there's no way to set a tokio-trace subscriber for the duration of each thread, since you don't control the thread initialization. You *might* be able to wrap every future you spawn with a subscriber call, but that's a lot of work.
I was also confused because the documentation said that setting a subscriber in the main thread would use that subscriber for the rest of the program. That isn't the case, though -- the subscriber will be used only on the main thread, and not on worker threads, etc.
## Solution
I added a function `set_global_default`, which works similarly to the `log` crate:
```rust
tokio_trace::subscriber::set_global_default(FooSubscriber::new());
```
The global subscriber (actually a global `Dispatch`) is a `static mut` protected by an atomic; implementation is copied from the `log` crate. It is used as a fallback if a thread has no `Dispatch` currently set. This is extremely simple to use, and doesn't break any existing functionality.
Performance-wise, thread-local `Dispatch` lookup goes from ~4.5ns to ~5ns, according to the benchmarks. So, barely any runtime overhead. (Presumably there's a little compile-time overhead but idk how to measure that.) Since the atomic guard is only ever written once, it will be shared among a CPU's cores and read very cheaply.
I added some docs to partially address #1151. I also switched the tokio-trace benchmarks to criterion because the nightly benchmarks weren't compiling (missing `dyn` flags?)
Currently, when the `trace_span!`, `debug_span!`, `info_span!`,
`warn_span!`, and `error_span!` macros are invoked with an explicit
parent, a name, and zero or more fields (no target), the macros don't
pass along the explicitly provided parent when expanding to the `span!`
macro. This is likely due to an oversight on my part.
This branch fixes these macros by adding the parent into the `span!`
macro expansion. I've also added a test to catch regressions
Shoutout to @jonhoo for catching this one!
Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
While we're making breaking changes to `tokio-trace`, it would be good
to get rid of the `AsId` trait. The goal of span functions that are
generic over `Span`/`Id` can be achieved without the unnecessary
complexity of defining a new trait. This would also make the API added
to `tokio_trace_core::Event` in #1109 more consistent with the
`tokio-trace::Span` API.
This branch removes `AsId` from `tokio-trace` and replaces its uses with
`impl Into<Option<Id>>` and `impl Into<Option<&'a Id>>`. While `AsRef`
might be more semantically correct for the borrowed-`Id` conversion, its
signature doesn't permit conversion into an `Option`. Implementations of
`Into<Option<Id>>` and `Into<Option<&'a Id>>` have been added for
`tokio_trace::Span`.
This is _technically_ a breaking API change, as it changes function
signatures. However, the existing macro syntax still works as-is, and
the tests which pass `&Id`, `&Span`, and `&Option<Id>` to the span
macros all still compile after this change.
Closes#1143
Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
The runtime is inherently multi-threaded, so it's going to have to deal
with synchronization when submitting new tasks anyway. This allows a
runtime to be shared by multiple threads more easily when e.g. building
a blocking facade over a tokio-based API.
## Motivation
A common pattern in `tokio-trace` is to use the value of a local
variable as a field on a span or event. Currently, this requires code
like:
```rust
info!(foo = foo);
```
which is not particularly ergonomic given how commonly this occurs.
Struct initializers support a shorthand syntax for fields where the name
of the field is the same as a local variable, and `tokio-trace` should
as well.
## Solution
This branch adds support for syntax like
```rust
let foo = ...;
info!(foo);
```
and
```rust
let foo = Foo {
bar: ...,
...
};
info!(foo.bar)
```
to the `tokio-trace` span and event macros. This syntax also works with
the `Debug` and `Display` field shorthand.
The span macros previously used a field name with no value to indicate
an uninitialized field. A new issue, #1138, has been opened for finding a
replacement syntax for uninitialized fields. Until then, the `tokio-trace`
macros will no longer provide a way to create fields without values,
although the `-core` API will continue to support this.
Closes#1062
Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
## Motivation
Currently, the primary way to use a span is to use `.enter` and pass a
closure to be executed under the span. While that is convenient in many
settings, it also comes with two decently inconvenient drawbacks:
- It breaks control flow statements like `return`, `?`, `break`, and
`continue`
- It require re-indenting a potentially large chunk of code if you wish
it to appear under a span
## Solution
This branch changes the `Span::enter` function to return a scope guard
that exits the span when dropped, as in:
```rust
let guard = span.enter();
// code here is within the span
drop(guard);
// code here is no longer within the span
```
The method previously called `enter`, which takes a closure and
executes it in the span's context, is now called `Span::in_scope`, and
was reimplemented on top of the new `enter` method.
This is a breaking change to `tokio-trace` that will be part of the
upcoming 0.2 release.
Closes#1075
Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
This updates tests to track a fix applied in Mio. Previously, Mio
incorrectly fired HUP events. This was due to Mio mapping `RDHUP` to
HUP. The test is updated to correctly generate a HUP event.
Additionally, HUP events will be removed from all platforms except for
Linux. This is caused by the inability to reliably map kqueue events to
the epoll HUP behavior.
## Motivation
In `tokio-trace`, field values may be recorded as either a subset of
Rust primitive types or as `fmt::Display` and `fmt::Debug`
implementations. Currently, `tokio-trace` provides the `field::display`
and `field::debug` functions which wrap a type with a type that
implements `Value` using the wrapped type's `fmt::Display` or
`fmt::Debug` implementation. However, importing and using these
functions adds unnecessary boilerplate.
In #1081, @jonhoo suggested adding shorthand syntax to the macros,
similar to that used by the `slog` crate, as a solution for the
wordiness of the current API.
## Solution
This branch adds `?` and `%` sigils to field values in the span and
event macros, which expand to the `field::debug` and `field::display`
wrappers, respectively. The shorthand sigils may be used in any position
where the macros take a field value.
For example:
```rust
trace_span!("foo", my_field = ?something, ...); // shorthand for `debug`
info!(foo = %value, bar = false, ...) // shorthand for `display`
```
Adding this shorthand required a fairly large change to how field
key-value pairs are handled by the macros --- since `%foo` and `%foo`
are not valid Rust expressions, we can no longer match repeated
`$ident = $expr` patterns, and must now match field lists as repeated
token trees. The inner helper macros for constructing `FieldSet`s and
`ValueSet`s have to parse the token trees recursively. This added a
decent chunk of complexity, but fortunately we have a large number of
compile tests for the macros and I'm quite confident that all existing
invocations will still work.
Closes#1081
Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <[email protected]>
Callers may not always have `futures` available at the root of the
crate. Re-exporting dependencies makes them available to the macro at a
deterministic location.
Ivan Petkov